Thursday, 22 March 2012

Edmodo: a little anarchy please


Edmodo... the 'Secure Social Learning Network'. 'The Facebook for the classroom’. I have spoken to two teachers in the last 10 days who use it — they were both animated.

But what can it do for my students’ learning?

Sure, it has the very obvious benefit of mimicking a social tool that has most students enthralled… OK class we are going to ‘Facebook’ our English lessons… All hands on deck.

And, true, Edmodo does allow me to establish effective communication channels. Teacher–student, student–student and teacher–parent. It also enables an online point of exchange. I can provide students with resources, information and feedback; students can submit assessment tasks and other materials.

But this is just effective housekeeping. What about quality learning? And learning that is tangible, that I can measure and evaluate and provide feedback on?

I can ask the class to participate in online discussions. But I can see this falling into two categories: 1) the teacher leads discussion on a topic and the students obligingly bumble along, wishing they were in the real Facebook, where they have greater agency; or 2) the students respond but utilise the same quick-fire, three-word language forms they use in Facebook.




How can I utilise the social, collaborative, ‘community of learners’ quality of Edmodo while at the same time directly developing my students’ language and meta-cognitive skills?

Here is my idea* (and I think this could work for any student cohort; some would need a greater level of scaffolding than others, naturally): student-led and moderated class discussions.

*(Actually, this idea came to me from a University of NSW academic. See his excellent co-authored paper on student moderation for a more scholarly coverage.)

The logistics:

Throughout the year, students are assigned a week in which they will moderate the class discussion on Edmodo. The moderator is expected to post a discussion paper a few days before their week begins. This could be a mere few hundred words or, for older or higher ability student cohorts, a several page exploration. The discussion paper would require some degree of research.

The moderator would post up the paper with a set of discussion points and/or questions. The class would then read the paper and respond to the points or questions. The moderator’s role is to develop the discussion.

The teacher’s role is simply to inject extra information or direction if necessary. If the exercise is well scaffolded, the teacher’s role would be largely invisible.

At the end of the week, the student moderator rewrites the initial paper, this time incorporating the new ideas generated from the class discussion. They would also write a briefer secondary report that reflected on the moderation process.

Students would be assessed for the quality of their initial paper, their ability to lead and develop the discussion, their ability to incorporate the fresh ideas from the discussion into their paper and the extent to which their reflective piece demonstrates a meta-cognitive understanding as opposed to a simple retelling.

Students would also be assessed on the quality of their non-moderator contributions to the class discussions across the year. They would be expected to contribute something each week.

The challenge for the teacher is high quality scaffolding. In particular, guiding students in developing that crucial initial discussion paper and in being able to foster engagement during the discussion.

The benefits for the teacher are potentially great: it is possible that within a few months students’ ability and willingness to engage in the class discussions will be self-regulating.

The benefits for students: ownership, empowerment; student-centred and directed learning; deeper, meta-cognitive learning and skill development; more relevant and engaged discussion and thus learning.

This would be a highly inclusive learning environment. There are students who never participate in face to face classroom discussions, because they are shy, or they prefer to reflect before they comment, or they are not proficient in English, or they have poor hearing. These students would find they have a voice.  

And the quality of the learning? The asynchronous nature of the discussion provides students with the opportunity to reflect on their thoughts before posting, resulting in a much more complex and valuable response than would occur in a face to face classroom.

A word of warning. This is not a way to reduce your workload. All those posts would still have to be read each week!

Cheers, M 

No comments:

Post a Comment